logo

Dear MAX: My Farewell to the Bus

Dear MAX,

When I first moved to Kansas City about two years ago, every morning I drove six minutes to work along your route on Main Street. I was proud of my choice to live in the urban core and proud of a commute time much shorter than the Kansas City average of 20 minutes. But every time I saw you at the stop right around the corner from my apartment, and every time I saw you dropping off passengers a couple of blocks from where I worked, I felt like a fraud, MAX. Seeing you reminded me that I was dismissing a perfectly convenient transportation option. You also reminded me that I drove 0.27 miles – to the gym – on a regular basis. And that I didn’t recycle enough, or grow my own herbs. You reminded me of all the ways I could be better if only I made that little extra effort.

Then my car got stolen while parked at work, which for a moment made me hate the stupid urban core and reminded me that I wasn’t such a fraud after all, as I was beginning to experience the full effect of my urban inclinations. But it also forced the issue with us. This is how I finally ditched my car for you.  And this is how guilt gave way to insight.

With you I was more physically active just going through my regular day than I’d been in a long time, which was not surprising, but I discovered additional benefits. Because of you I paid attention to the weather and became mindful of how I used my time. I got to catch up on podcasts while walking to and from you and eavesdropped on conversations during the ride. I had new opportunities for new goals (like catching the 7:58) and small victories (getting a seat on the 8:08). I saw the city from a pedestrian’s perspective. I felt connected to rhythms independent of and indifferent to my own patterns, that key and amazing benefit of living in a city – the discovery that, for better or worse, the world does not revolve around any one of us. I absolutely, genuinely, exhaustedly loved you, MAX.

But just as I discovered unexpected benefits, I stumbled upon two major downsides, especially after I changed jobs a couple of months ago. My new job is a mile closer to where I live, so it now takes me exactly four minutes to drive to work every morning. With a ridiculous four-minute commute, I’m one of those people for whom it makes the most practical sense to ride the bus in Kansas City, but also one for whom it makes the least economic sense. Why? Because a four-minute commute is crazy short, and even at today’s higher gas prices, it costs only about $10 per month. And because it would cost me $50 per month to ride the bus.

You might argue that a $50 bus pass would also cover the cost of trips to places other than work, and you would be correct, except I wouldn’t take the bus to those other places. Our transportation network and the distribution of services in the city aren’t tight enough to make that feasible. Getting to a doctor’s appointment in the middle of the day would mean missing almost an entire day of work. Grocery shopping would require carrying several extra pounds on the way back – or taking more than an hour every day for “quick” runs. I tried them both, and it really doesn’t work.  I even considered riding MAX to an event at the Overland Park Convention Center, and I found that in order to get there by 10 a.m., I’d have to leave my house by 6:30 a.m. – just like flying to Chicago for a mid-morning meeting.

The inconvenience of it might seem like the greatest disincentive to ride the bus in Kansas City, but it isn’t the only one. When I told people I was trying to figure out how to get to Overland Park by bus, they laughed at me. (Heck, I laughed at me.) But ultimately I didn’t try it, not just because it was inconvenient, but also because I didn’t want to be seen walking in Overland Park.

The biggest downside I found in riding the bus for a year was that instead of changing people’s perceptions of public transportation as a second-rate option, I became a second-rate curiosity myself. When friends saw me waiting for the bus, they tried complicated traffic maneuvers to “rescue” me. They secretly followed me to the bus stop after work to make sure I made it ok. Of course my friends just wanted to make things easier for me, but even strangers assumed I needed help. Commuters in suits and ties turned to look at me while driving by; sometimes they slowed down and asked if everything was ok. People who barely knew me looked at me suspiciously upon learning of my transportation habits, and the professional implications were clear. (Given any “elevator speeches” while on the bus? Ride the bus to any board meetings? I didn’t think so …)

I get it. Riding the bus in a sprawling city when most of my professional peers don’t is a little crazy. I still believe it’s the right thing to do, but I now know that abandoning the car in Kansas City is not just a matter of making a little extra effort. Driving less is a choice both not supported by our infrastructure and unappealing professionally. It’s a choice that requires a tight transportation network, and perhaps more importantly, a real change in our culture.

 

  1. Eric Reply
    In a city that was designed around the personal automobile the bus will always be at a competitive disadvantage. Don't blame the bus, blame the transportation system that makes driving so damn easy. Taking the bus in dense, walkable cities isn't a viable option because it's more convenient or faster than the MAX. They are viable options because the bus competes on same playing field as driving. While I don't blame you in your decision to drive (it definitely is a lot more convenient in most circumstances in KC) part of advocating for a better city is attacking the actual problem. KCATA isn't the problem. The MAX isn't the problem. Public policy that puts the personal automobile above all else IS the problem.
    • Sara Reply
      Hi Eric! Agreed. My farewell to MAX wasn't meant to be an attack on MAX or KCATA. It was meant to illustrate just how difficult/strange it is to choose public transportation BECAUSE of the wrongheaded policies you allude to. You're absolutely right - the problem is that driving is so favored and subsidized that public transportation becomes expensive (not to mention inconvenient) by comparison. I'm just describing the symptoms as a way to highlight that a simple willingness to ride the bus isn't going to change anything.
      • Eric Reply
        Sara, as I mentioned, I don't blame you or anyone else for choosing a transportation mode that is generally most convenient. There are certainly other benefits to using KCATA buses but the most important one for the average commuter is convenience. Sadly we are a long way from transit being as convenient as driving. Keep up the good work!
  2. Matt Reply
    If you lived in a suburb like Blue Springs and tried to get people into Blue Springs public transportation, it just wouldn't seem to make sense. There's a point at which a city is big enough that there's money enough to pull something off like this. It's not a cultural issue, it's a financial one. KC has among the lowest population densities among "big cities" evar. Mexico City, New York, Toronto, Seattle, DC, these place have population density. So, the real change that needs to happen is not to change the transit stigma into warm fuzzies, it's to give KC an economy, get people to move closer together. But there's nothing going on in the urban area of KC. All the big $$$ moves around in Overland Park, or other areas outside the urban core. KC has the urban thing backwards. It's high density residential blocks, vastly unpopulated, and then people migrate out to the burbs to work, where it's densely populated. That recipe is the opposite to any city with public transit. All those buildings in NY have businesses in them, not empty lofts, like KC does. So, trying to get public transit going in Blue Springs is actually the most feasible option here. Except, the nucleus of this public transit system needs to follow the money, in OP. Lawrence has public transit because it's got a mission statement, it's a college town. Down town KC has no mission statement. It's filled with points of sale, points of service, and lofts. Ain't nobody gonna put a transit in that.
  3. Jim Reply
    Matt, Thanks for reading and taking the time to comment. Regarding KC and transit and how it relates to density... "Transit" (bus) use in KC is actually up a little over 5% from last year, and ahead of the national transit usage which improved by around 2.5%. I'd say by that alone there's some data that suggests it might be a viable solution (http://www.apta.com/mediacenter/pressreleases/2012/Pages/121210.aspx) Your point about density is something that actually hits home with us, too. The density and distribution in KC is wack, especially for the city of its size. At the same time, I'd be surprised if there was nothing that could be done to improve transit in KC prior to substantial density increases. And actually, stigmas associated with public transportation and "those people" who actually use it is something that cities all over the country struggle with. Primarily in car oriented towns, it really is seen as the poor persons mobility, and that is a big part of the problem. That perception is something that is probably deeply tied to (as you said) the "money" living in the suburbs - places that are deeply car oriented and have no use for transit unless, well, you're desparate, right?

Leave a Reply

*

captcha *